Alternatives

10 Best Bear Alternatives

Ruud Caris
Ruud CarisEditor-in-Chief
Updated: 8 January 2026About Bear →

Bear is loved for its minimalist design and markdown support, but is strictly limited to Apple devices. Users often look for alternatives when they need support for Windows or Android, or when they're missing functionalities like tables, collaboration, or a web version.

136+ toolscompared
No sponsored rankings

My recommendations

Best OverallUpnote

Upnote

4.6/5

Nearly identical interface with full cross-platform support

View Upnote →
Best for Power UsersObsidian

Obsidian

4.6/5

Local storage and unlimited customization options via plugins

View Obsidian →
Best for AppleCraft

Craft

4.3/5

High-quality design with better document formatting capabilities

View Craft →
Best Open SourceJoplin

Joplin

4.1/5

Free synchronization and complete control over your own data

View Joplin →

At a glance

ToolScoreBest for
Upnote
4.6/5
Users looking for a Bear clone for Windows and AndroidView →
Obsidian
4.6/5
Power users who require local data storage and pluginsView →
Craft
4.3/5
People who want to share visually attractive documentsView →
Joplin
4.1/5
Privacy-conscious users who prefer open-source softwareView →
Noteplan
4.5/5
Professionals who want to combine tasks and notesView →
Reflect Notes
4.5/5
Entrepreneurs and thinkers looking for AI integrationView →
Logseq
4.5/5
Students and researchers working with outlinesView →
Capacities
4.3/5
People who want visual structure and object typesView →
Evernote
4.4/5
Users looking for a digital filing cabinetView →
Notion
4.4/5
Teams who want to integrate notes and projectsView →

All Bear alternatives at a glance

1
Upnote

Upnote

Users looking for a Bear clone for Windows and Android

4.6/5 · Free / from 2 dollar

UpNote is a cross-platform note-taking app that closely resembles Bear in appearance and functionality. The tool is built for users looking for a clean writing environment but who don't want to be tied to the Apple ecosystem. It offers extensive formatting options, including colored text, highlights, and tables, which are more limited in Bear. A unique feature is the 'lifetime' license option alongside the monthly subscription. Unlike Bear, which uses iCloud for synchronization, UpNote stores data via its own servers (Firebase). A significant drawback is the lack of end-to-end encryption, which can be a stumbling block for privacy-conscious users.

Difference: Full support for Windows, Linux, and Android

Choose this if: cross-platform synchronization is necessary

✓ What we like

  • Affordable lifetime deal (approx. € 40)
  • Very fast synchronization
  • Clean, distraction-free interface
  • Excellent Markdown support

✗ What we don't like

  • No end-to-end encryption (E2EE)
  • No full-fledged web version
  • No collaboration features
2
Obsidian

Obsidian

Power users who require local data storage and plugins

4.6/5 · Free / from 4 dollar

Obsidian is a knowledge management tool that works with local Markdown files on the user's device. It is designed for researchers and developers who want complete control over their data and structure. Core functionality includes bi-directional links and a graphical view of note relationships. Because files are stored locally, the app is extremely fast and works completely offline. The interface is less polished than Bear's, but can be fully customized via hundreds of community plugins. Synchronization between devices requires a paid subscription (Obsidian Sync) or a custom technical solution via iCloud or Git.

Difference: Data is stored locally in folders, not in a database

Choose this if: complete control over file structure is required

✓ What we like

  • Fully local management
  • Huge plugin library
  • Standard Markdown files
  • Unique graph view

✗ What we don't like

  • Steep learning curve
  • Slow mobile app
  • Pricey synchronization option
3
Craft

Craft

People who want to share visually attractive documents

4.3/5 · Free / from 8 dollar

Craft is a document editor focused on visual presentation and structure through a block-based system. The app is primarily built for the Apple ecosystem, but also offers a web version and Windows app. It distinguishes itself through the ability to directly share notes as beautifully formatted web pages. Where Bear focuses purely on text and markdown, Craft treats each paragraph as a movable block, similar to Notion. This makes the app less suitable for pure markdown purists, as export and compatibility are more complex. The focus is more on creating documents than on quick notes.

Difference: Block-based editor instead of plain text

Choose this if: documents need to be shared with clients or teams

✓ What we like

  • Beautiful, polished native design
  • Fast offline-first performance
  • Excellent iOS and iPad apps
  • Daily notes linked to cal...

✗ What we don't like

  • Databases less powerful than Notion
  • Windows app less refined than Mac
  • Free version has strict block limit
  • No Kanban view for tasks
4
Joplin

Joplin

Privacy-conscious users who prefer open-source software

4.1/5 · Free / from 2 euro

Joplin is an open-source note-taking application that focuses on privacy and data ownership. It is suitable for users looking for a free, secure alternative without vendor lock-in. The app supports standard markdown and offers end-to-end encryption, just like Bear. A major difference is that users can choose their own synchronization service, such as Dropbox, OneDrive, or Nextcloud, without additional costs. The interface is functional but lacks the visual refinement and animations of Bear. It is a utilitarian tool that prioritizes functionality over aesthetics, which can be a disadvantage for design-sensitive users.

Difference: Free choice in cloud storage for synchronization

Choose this if: free synchronization via own cloud is desired

✓ What we like

  • Completely free and open-source
  • End-to-end encryption (E2EE)
  • Local storage (Offline-first)
  • Extensive Markdown support

✗ What we don't like

  • Dated and dense interface
  • No native collaboration (real-time)
  • Sync setup complex for beginners
  • Mobile app more limited than desktop
5
Noteplan

Noteplan

Professionals who want to combine tasks and notes

4.5/5 · From 8 dollar

NotePlan combines markdown notes with a calendar and task list in one application. It is specifically built for Apple users who want to integrate their daily planning and notes. The core is the 'Daily Note', where tasks, appointments, and notes come together. NotePlan uses, like Obsidian, local text files that are stored in iCloud or on the device itself. This makes the data future-proof and accessible to other apps. The price is significantly higher than Bear's, making it less attractive for users who only want to create simple notes without planning functionality.

Difference: Deep integration with Apple Calendar and Reminders

Choose this if: daily planning is central to the workflow

✓ What we like

  • All-in-one: Notes, Tasks & Calendar
  • Full Markdown & stored locally
  • Seamless Apple Calendar/Reminders integ...
  • Digital 'Bullet Journal' method

✗ What we don't like

  • Apple only (iOS/macOS), no Windows
  • Pricey subscription (~€100/year)
  • No 'infinite' recurring tasks
  • Learning curve if you don't know Markdown
6
Reflect Notes

Reflect Notes

Entrepreneurs and thinkers looking for AI integration

4.5/5 · From 10 dollar

Reflect is a fast, network-based note-taking app that focuses on creating connections between ideas (backlinks). The tool is built for knowledge workers who value speed and security. Reflect offers standard end-to-end encryption and synchronizes directly between devices. It has built-in AI functions for summarizing or rewriting text and integrates with Kindle and Readwise. Although it has a web-based architecture, it feels very responsive. However, the price is high and there is no free version available, which can be a barrier for casual users.

Difference: Native integration of AI and calendar in a network structure

Choose this if: end-to-end encryption and AI features are required

✓ What we like

  • Intuitive interface
  • Fast performance
  • Powerful AI integration
  • Secure encryption

✗ What we don't like

  • High subscription price
  • Limited formatting options
  • No folder structure
7
Logseq

Logseq

Students and researchers who work with outlines

4.5/5 · Free / from 5 dollar

Logseq is a privacy-first outliner that works with local files. It is aimed at users who think in bullet points and hierarchical structures instead of long documents. Like Obsidian, Logseq stores everything locally, but the interface is set up as a journal by default. It supports PDF annotations where highlights directly link to the source, a feature that Bear also has but which is more extensive in Logseq for research. The software is still in active development (beta), which can sometimes lead to bugs or instability compared to the polished experience of Bear.

Difference: Outliner structure (bullet points) is the default

Choose this if: PDF annotation and local storage are crucial

✓ What we like

  • Privacy-first & locally stored
  • Excellent PDF annotation & highlights
  • Powerful outliner workflow
  • Frictionless 'Daily Journal' setup

✗ What we don't like

  • Mobile app experience is subpar
  • Sync issues (especially iCloud)
  • Slow development of 'Database version'
  • Performance slow with large graphs
8
Capacities

Capacities

People who want visual structure and object types

4.3/5 · Free / from 10 dollar

Capacities approaches notes as objects (such as Books, People, Meetings) instead of separate files. It is built for people who want to add structure to their knowledge without being stuck with folders. Each note has a 'type' with specific properties, which provides a database-like structure similar to Notion, but with the speed of a note-taking app. Unlike Bear, Capacities is a cloud-first application; there is no full offline mode for the desktop. This makes it less suitable for people who often work without an internet connection.

Difference: Object-based organization instead of tags/folders

Choose this if: structured data is more important than plain text

✓ What we like

  • Intuitive object-based structure
  • Fast, native mobile apps
  • Daily notes & calendar integr...
  • WhatsApp & Telegram integration

✗ What we don't like

  • No collaboration
  • Limited import options
  • No native iPad/tablet app
  • No database formulas like Notion
9
Evernote

Evernote

Users looking for a digital filing cabinet

4.4/5 · Free / from 11 dollar

Evernote is the classic note-taking app that focuses on collecting all kinds of information. It is suitable for users who want to store and make searchable heavy files, PDFs, and web clips. The OCR feature (text recognition in images) is very powerful and even searches handwritten notes. Where Bear is minimalist and fast, Evernote is feature-rich but therefore often slower and more sluggish. Pricing has increased significantly in recent years, making it an expensive option for many users compared to lighter alternatives like Bear.

Difference: Powerful Web Clipper and OCR search features

Choose this if: scanning and searching documents is a priority

✓ What we like

  • Powerful search function
  • Superior Web Clipper
  • Accurate text recognition
  • Convenient document scanner

✗ What we don't like

  • Excessively high price
  • Very limited free version
  • Slow desktop application
10
Notion

Notion

Teams who want to integrate notes and projects

4.4/5 · Free / from 10 dollar

Notion is an all-in-one workspace that combines notes with databases, wikis, and project management. It is built for teams and individuals who want to organize their entire life or work in one system. Unlike the plain text of Bear, Notion offers powerful databases with different views (board, calendar, list). This makes it possible to build complex systems. The downside of this flexibility is slowness; opening the app takes longer than with Bear and offline support is very limited. It is less suitable for quick 'quick capture' of ideas.

Difference: Database functionality and collaboration options

Choose this if: collaboration and databases are required

✓ What we like

  • All-in-one workspace (docs/tasks)
  • Huge customizability & flexibility
  • Powerful databases with relations
  • Relatively good mobile app

✗ What we don't like

  • No full offline mode
  • Slowness with large databases
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • No password protection on pages

For whom is Bear the best choice?

Bear is built for Apple users who sync their notes between iPhone, iPad, and Mac. The tool integrates fully with the Apple ecosystem, including widgets, Shortcuts, and Handoff. For those who work exclusively on Apple devices and don’t need collaboration with others, Bear offers a consistent experience without the complexity of cross-platform tools.

Bear also remains relevant for writers and bloggers who use Markdown. The editor supports WikiLinks for internal references and offers export to PDF, HTML, and DOCX. The distraction-free focus mode and the ability to organize with hashtags instead of folders suits users who create 20 to 100 notes per month without needing hierarchical structures.

The price of € 1,49 per month or € 14,99 per year is justified for individual users who value native Apple integration and don’t need collaboration features. For students and professionals who make notes primarily for themselves and don’t use Windows or Android devices, Bear offers sufficient functionality.

Why would you look for a Bear alternative?

The biggest limitation is the lack of support for Windows and Android. If you use a Windows laptop at work and have an iPhone privately, you can’t use Bear on both devices. Alternatives like UpNote and Joplin do offer full cross-platform sync, making your notes available on any device.

Bear lacks collaboration features for teams. You can’t share notes with colleagues for real-time editing, there are no comment features, and no permissions to manage access. For teams of 3 or more people working together on documents, tools like Craft or Notion are better suited. They offer shared workspaces, version history, and the ability to assign tasks.

Another reason to switch is the need for databases and tables. Bear organizes notes only with tags and doesn’t support spreadsheet-like views or relational databases. Users who manage more than 200 notes and want to filter them by multiple properties at once, such as status, date, and category, need more structure than Bear offers. Obsidian with plugins or Notion with databases solve this.

Finally

The choice depends on your devices and workflow. For Windows and Android users, UpNote is the most comparable option in terms of interface and price. Privacy-conscious users who want full control over their data choose Joplin with end-to-end encryption and local storage. Teams who want to share documents with external parties benefit from the publishing features in Craft. Looking for the most flexibility with plugins and local storage? Then Obsidian is the best choice, especially for users who manage more than 500 notes. For those who want to combine tasks and notes in one tool with a calendar view, NotePlan offers the most value at € 12,99 per month.

Frequently asked questions

Can I export my notes from Bear to Obsidian?

Yes, Bear uses standard Markdown. You can export all your notes as .md files (including attachments) and open this folder directly in Obsidian as a 'Vault'.

Which Bear alternative works well on Windows?

UpNote is the best alternative for Windows users looking for the Bear experience. Obsidian and Joplin also have full Windows support.

Is there a Bear alternative with collaboration features?

Bear does not support collaboration. For real-time collaboration, Craft, Notion, or Google Keep are better options, with Craft remaining visually closest to Bear.

Does a web version of Bear exist?

No, Bear does not have a web version. If you need access via a browser, UpNote, Craft, and Notion are suitable alternatives that are accessible via the web.