Alternatives

12 Best Fellow alternatives

Ruud Caris
Ruud CarisEditor-in-Chief
Updated: 30 July 2026About Fellow →

Fellow is a well-known application for managing meetings, agendas, and action items. However, there are several alternatives available that focus more on specific aspects such as AI transcription, video storage, or CRM integrations. This list provides an overview of the main competitors in the market.

142+ toolscompared
No sponsored rankings

My recommendations

Best OverallFireflies

Fireflies

4.2/5

Wide integrations and strong AI summaries

View Fireflies →
Best FreeFathom

Fathom

4.2/5

Unlimited free recording and transcription

View Fathom →
Most SimilarAvoma

Avoma

Combines calendars, notes, and AI transcription

View Avoma →
Best BudgetTactiq

Tactiq

4.2/5

Affordable in-browser transcription without bots

View Tactiq →

At a glance

ToolScoreBest for
Fireflies
4.2/5
Automated notes and searchable transcriptsView →
Bluedot
Privacy-first AI note taker without agenda overheadView →
Fathom
4.2/5
Free meeting recordings and transcriptionsView →
Avoma
Sales teams and customer-focused organizationsView →
Otter
Real-time transcription and live collaborationView →
Read.ai
Meeting statistics analysis and participant engagementView →
MeetGeek
Sharing video clips and meeting highlightsView →
Sembly
Automatic note-taking and absence replacementView →
tl;dv
User research and product development teamsView →
Supernormal
Structured notes based on templatesView →
Grain
Sales coaching and customer researchView →
Tactiq
4.2/5
Bot-free transcription via browserView →
Notta
4.2/5
Multilingual transcription and audio uploadsView →

All Fellow alternatives at a glance

1
Fireflies

Fireflies

Automated notes and searchable transcripts

4.2/5 · Free / from 10 dollar

Fireflies is an AI assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings. The tool joins conversations via a calendar integration and generates text files with action items afterward. Users can search transcripts for specific keywords or speakers. The software integrates with various video calling platforms and project management tools. This allows action items to be sent directly to the right systems. The platform also offers analysis of talk time and conversation statistics, which helps in evaluating meeting dynamics. This makes retrieving information significantly faster.

Difference: Focus on speech analysis and extensive search functionality

Choose this if: AI notes and integrations are a priority

✓ What we like

  • Automatic meeting attendance
  • Strong integrations (Slack, CRM)
  • Good AI summaries
  • Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

  • Struggles with accents/jargon
  • Speaker recognition inaccurate
  • Video recording is pricey
2
Bluedot

Bluedot

Privacy-first AI note taker without agenda overhead

Where Fellow centers on agendas, one-on-ones, and action item tracking, Bluedot is a privacy-first AI note taker focused on automatically capturing and structuring the conversation itself. It records meetings across Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams through a Chrome extension without a visible bot, and encrypts all audio, transcripts, and notes. It also transcribes uploaded audio or video. Notes are generated in a format suited to the call type, and Bluedot automatically syncs summaries and follow-ups to CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, plus Notion. It supports transcription in over 100 languages, making it a better fit for teams that want notes and CRM updates generated automatically rather than a structured meeting-management framework.

Difference: A privacy-first AI note taker focused on automatic transcription and CRM sync, rather than agenda and action item management

Choose this if: automatic, privacy-first note-taking matters more than structured meeting workflows

✓ What we like

  • No visible bot in your meetings
  • Privacy-first: encrypted data, GDPR-compliant
  • Seamless CRM integration (HubSpot/Slack)
  • Supports more than 100 languages

✗ What we don't like

  • Free plan limited to 5 meetings/month
  • Requires an internet connection (cloud-based processing)
  • Interface can feel overwhelming
  • Transcription sometimes difficult with accents
1
Fathom

Fathom

Free meeting recordings and transcriptions

4.2/5 · Free / from 15 dollar

Fathom is an AI note-taker that records and transcribes video meetings. The basic plan offers unlimited recordings and transcriptions at no cost. During the meeting, users can highlight important moments, after which the software saves these clips. Afterward, the system generates a summary that can be sent directly to CRM systems or chat applications. The tool requires installation on the computer and works with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. This ensures quick processing of video data.

Difference: Offers unlimited basic features without monthly costs

Choose this if: budget plays an important role

✓ What we like

  • Generous free version (unlimited recording)
  • High transcription accuracy
  • Seamless Zoom/Teams/Meet integration
  • Automatic action items & summary

✗ What we don't like

  • No full-featured mobile app
  • Advanced AI features are paid
  • Bot visible in meetings
  • Summaries sometimes too formal
4
Avoma

Avoma

Sales teams and customer-focused organizations

Avoma is a meeting management platform that focuses on the complete lifecycle of a conversation. The software offers functionalities for preparing agendas, recording audio, and generating AI notes. The system is specifically designed for sales and customer service teams, with direct connections to CRM systems. Users can collaboratively edit notes during the meeting. The tool also analyzes conversation trends and team member performance. This helps managers coach their employees based on actual conversation data.

Difference: Combines calendar management with CRM synchronization and conversation analysis

Choose this if: CRM integration and conversation analysis are necessary

✓ What we like

  • Structured AI notes
  • Deep CRM integration (HubSpot/SF)
  • Coaching insights (talk time/ratio)
  • Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

  • Reliability issues (dropouts/late joins)
  • Hidden costs for extra features
  • Slow CRM sync (>60 min)
  • Transcription struggles with accents
5
Otter

Otter

Real-time transcription and live collaboration

Otter is a transcription service that converts speech to text in real-time. The tool joins online meetings and immediately generates readable text. Users can add comments, highlight text, and insert images into the transcription during the conversation. After the meeting, the system creates an automated summary with action items. The software is also usable for transcribing in-person conversations via the mobile application. This makes it a versatile choice for both online and offline meetings.

Difference: Focus on live text generation and editing during conversations

Choose this if: reading along during meetings in real-time is desired

✓ What we like

  • High transcription accuracy
  • OtterPilot automates note-taking
  • Convenient AI summaries
  • Integration with Zoom/Teams/Meet

✗ What we don't like

  • Very limited free plan
  • Only 3 imports in free version
  • No video recording (audio only)
  • Supports few languages
6
Read.ai

Read.ai

Meeting statistics analysis and participant engagement

Read.ai analyzes meetings using artificial intelligence. In addition to transcribing and summarizing conversations, the software measures participant engagement and sentiment. The system provides visual alerts during the meeting when attention is waning or when one person is talking too much. Afterwards, users receive a report with statistics about the meeting's effectiveness. The tool integrates with popular video conferencing platforms. This data helps teams schedule future meetings to be shorter and more effective.

Difference: Measures participant sentiment and engagement

Choose this if: meeting quality and efficiency need to be measured

✓ What we like

  • Accurate transcriptions (multilingual)
  • Handy 'Search Copilot' feature
  • Good integration with Zoom and Teams
  • Saves a lot of time taking notes

✗ What we don't like

  • Adds itself to calls uninvited
  • Privacy concerns and broad data access
  • Difficult to delete account/data
  • Poor customer service
7
MeetGeek

MeetGeek

Sharing video clips and meeting highlights

MeetGeek is a platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes video meetings. The software automatically creates short video clips of important moments from the conversation. These clips can be easily shared with team members who weren't present. The system categorizes action items and decisions in a searchable archive. The tool also offers integrations with task management systems to directly convert action items into tasks. This reduces the need for manual task transfer after a meeting.

Difference: Focus on creating and sharing short video highlights

Choose this if: visual summaries need to be shared

✓ What we like

  • High transcription accuracy
  • Supports 60+ languages
  • Good AI summaries & action items
  • Integrations with HubSpot, Slack, Trello

✗ What we don't like

  • Bot sometimes joins late (about 1 min)
  • Spammy emails to participants
  • Limited video recording in free plan
  • Support sometimes responds slowly
8
Sembly

Sembly

Automatic note-taking and absence replacement

Sembly is an AI assistant that attends, records, and summarizes meetings. A notable feature is the ability to send the bot to a meeting on behalf of a user when they can't attend themselves. The tool generates notes, action items, and an overview of discussed topics afterwards. The platform supports multiple languages and offers a workspace where teams can centralize and search all meeting data. This saves time for employees who would otherwise have to attend multiple meetings simultaneously.

Difference: Can attend meetings when the user is absent

Choose this if: overlapping meetings are a problem

✓ What we like

  • Excellent summary structure
  • High accuracy for non-native speakers
  • Detects action items and risks
  • Supports 42+ languages

✗ What we don't like

  • Mobile app buggy and outdated
  • Free plan very limited (1 hour/month)
  • Bot gets stuck after meeting ends
  • Long meetings get split up
7
tl;dv

tl;dv

User research and product development teams

tl;dv is a recording and transcription tool built specifically for Google Meet and Zoom. The software allows users to add timestamps during the meeting, so important moments can be quickly found later. The platform is popular with product teams and user researchers for capturing customer conversations. The AI generates summaries and supports transcription in more than twenty languages. Videos can be shared directly via a link. This makes it easy to share specific customer feedback directly with the development team.

Difference: Strong focus on timestamps and sharing video clips

Choose this if: customer conversations and interviews are being recorded

✓ What we like

  • Unlimited recording (free version)
  • Accurate transcription (English)
  • Handy 'Ask tl;dv' search feature
  • Easy clip creation and sharing

✗ What we don't like

  • Bot sometimes doesn't join or joins late
  • Struggles with accents/dialects
  • Sales coaching very expensive ($98/m)
  • Bugs when loading videos
10
Supernormal

Supernormal

Structured notes based on templates

Supernormal is an AI tool that automatically takes notes from video meetings. The software uses templates to immediately format the generated text into the right structure, such as a sales call or a weekly team update. The tool works via a browser extension or a bot that participates in the conversation. Notes can be automatically synced with platforms like Notion, Google Docs, and various CRM systems. This ensures consistent record-keeping across the entire company, regardless of who leads the meeting.

Difference: Automatically formats notes using preset templates

Choose this if: fixed structures for reports are important

✓ What we like

  • Bot-free recording option (Google Meet)
  • Automatic, structured notes
  • Good action item extraction
  • Supports 60+ languages

✗ What we don't like

  • Free version recently heavily limited
  • No offline transcription available
  • Transcription struggles with accents
  • No 'click-on-text' video navigation
11
Grain

Grain

Sales coaching and customer research

Grain is a platform for recording and analyzing video meetings, primarily focused on sales and research teams. The software makes it possible to clip specific moments from a conversation and share them as short video clips. The AI generates summaries and identifies key insights from customer conversations. Users can create shared libraries where team members can search and view clips. This enables new employees to quickly learn from previous successful sales conversations.

Difference: Focus on creating video libraries for teams

Choose this if: video clips are used for training

✓ What we like

  • Automated notes & recordings
  • High audio quality & transcription
  • Clip & share video highlights
  • Integrations (Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot)

✗ What we don't like

  • Free plan limited to 20 meetings
  • Advanced features are paid
  • Lacks deep sales analytics (vs Gong)
  • Pricing transparency could be better
12
Tactiq

Tactiq

Bot-free transcription via browser

4.2/5 · Free / from 8 dollar

Tactiq is a browser extension that transcribes meetings without a bot having to join the conversation. The tool reads the captions from platforms like Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams directly in the browser. After the meeting, the system uses AI to generate summaries and action items. Because there's no external bot visible, many users experience this as a more privacy-friendly method for transcription. The generated text can then be easily exported to documents or project management software for further processing.

Difference: Works as an extension without a visible bot in the meeting

Choose this if: external bots are not allowed

✓ What we like

  • Bot-free Chrome extension
  • Real-time transcription during calls
  • Free plan for individuals (10/month)
  • Integrations with Slack, Notion, Drive

✗ What we don't like

  • No video or audio recording
  • Accuracy lower with accents
  • Free limit of 10 meetings per month
  • No full-featured mobile app
13
Notta

Notta

Multilingual transcription and audio uploads

4.2/5 · Free / from 8 dollar

Notta is a transcription and speech-to-text platform that supports more than a hundred languages. The software can transcribe live meetings via a bot, but users can also upload pre-recorded audio or video files for processing. The AI generates summaries and structures the text into readable paragraphs. The tool offers a mobile application for recording physical conversations and synchronizes all data across different devices. This makes the platform suitable for international teams that communicate and collaborate in different languages.

Difference: Supports more than a hundred languages for transcription

Choose this if: international conversations need to be transcribed

✓ What we like

  • High accuracy (NL/EN/JP)
  • Supports 58+ languages
  • Convenient 'Notta Memo' hardware option
  • Real-time transcription & translation

✗ What we don't like

  • Misleading 3-day trial period
  • Very limited free plan (3 min/item)
  • Canceling subscription is difficult
  • Privacy concerns (AI training on data)

When is Fellow still the best choice?

Fellow excels when your team primarily needs structured agenda management and centralization of action items. While tools like Fireflies and Otter focus primarily on transcription and notes, Fellow offers a complete framework for preparing, executing, and following up on meetings. The combination of recurring agendas, shared notes, and direct linking to action items makes it particularly suitable for teams that prioritize structure and accountability.

The integration with project management tools and the focus on one-on-ones and team meetings gives Fellow an edge when your organization works with fixed meeting rhythms and clear reporting lines. Tools like MeetGeek and tl;dv are stronger at sharing video clips, but lack the in-depth agenda and action item structure that Fellow provides. For organizations that view meetings as part of a broader performance management process, Fellow remains the most complete option.

When is a Fellow alternative better?

If automatic transcription and AI summaries are your priority, Fireflies and Otter offer stronger capabilities in this area. Fireflies indexes conversations to be fully searchable and generates detailed summaries with less manual input than Fellow requires. Otter delivers real-time transcription during meetings, which is especially useful for teams that want to read along live and edit directly. Both start at $1 per month or less, compared to Fellow’s higher entry price.

For teams that want to save and share video clips, MeetGeek and tl;dv are better choices. MeetGeek automatically creates highlights of important moments and makes it easy to share short clips with colleagues who missed the meeting. This is something Fellow doesn’t support by default. Fathom even offers unlimited recordings and transcripts in its free plan, making it an attractive alternative for teams on a limited budget. Read.ai adds analysis of participant engagement and sentiment, starting at $1 per month, providing valuable insights that Fellow doesn’t deliver.

In conclusion

Choose Fellow if structured agenda management and action item follow-up are central to your meeting culture. Go with Fireflies or Otter when automatic transcription and searchability are more important, or choose Fathom if you want a free basic version with unlimited recordings. For teams that want to share video clips, MeetGeek and tl;dv are the best options. Sales teams that need CRM integration will find a more complete alternative in Avoma starting at $1 per month.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fellow and AI transcription tools?

Fellow primarily focuses on preparing agendas and managing action items before and after the meeting. AI transcription tools mainly focus on capturing and summarizing the conversation itself.

Can I use these alternatives without other participants knowing?

Most tools use a bot that is visible in the meeting. Tools like Tactiq work via a browser extension and don't require a bot, which is more discreet.

Do these alternatives work well in Dutch?

The quality of Dutch transcription varies by tool. Platforms like Notta and tl;dv generally offer better multilingual support than tools that focus purely on the English market.