Alternatives

10 Best MeetGeek Alternatives

Ruud CarisEditor-in-Chief

Updated: 23 January 2026About MeetGeek →

MeetGeek is a solid choice for automatic meeting notes, but some teams are looking for more specific CRM integrations or a different pricing model. The alternatives below offer similar transcription and summary features, ranging from sales-focused tools to simple recorders.

136+ toolscompared

✓No sponsored rankings

My recommendations

Best Overall

Fireflies

★ 4.2/5

Widest integrations and strong search features

View Fireflies →

Best Free

tl;dv

Unlimited recording in free version

View tl;dv →

Best for Teams

Avoma

Strong focus on sales and coaching

View Avoma →

Most Similar

Sembly

Similar focus on action items and summaries

View Sembly →

At a glance

ToolScoreBest for

Fireflies

★4.2/5

Teams that need many integrationsView →

tl;dv

Users who want to review video recordingsView →

Otter

Real-time transcription and notesView →

Fathom

★4.2/5

Individuals and quick sharingView →

Avoma

Sales and customer success teamsView →

Sembly

Teams that want to skip meetingsView →

Grain

User research and product teamsView →

Supernormal

Google Meet usersView →

Jamie

Discreet use without botsView →

Bluedot

Google Chrome power usersView →

All MeetGeek alternatives at a glance

Fireflies

Teams that need many integrations

★ 4.2/5 · Free / from 10 dollar

Fireflies.ai is a widely used meeting assistant that automatically joins conversations to record and transcribe them. The tool supports audio and video meetings and generates searchable transcriptions. In addition to standard summaries, it offers 'Smart Search filters' that allow users to quickly find action items, questions, or specific topics. The platform integrates with a wide range of business apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Asana, making it a central hub for conversation data. The focus is heavily on making spoken knowledge searchable within organizations.

Difference: More extensive third-party integration options

Choose this if: maximum connectivity with other apps is required

✓ What we like

✓Automatic meeting attendance
✓Strong integrations (Slack, CRM)
✓Good AI summaries
✓Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

✗Struggles with accents/jargon
✗Speaker recognition inaccurate
✗Video recording is pricey

View Fireflies →More details →

tl;dv

Users who want to review video recordings

tl;dv focuses specifically on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams with a strong emphasis on video. Rather than just text, the tool links transcriptions directly to timestamps in the video recording. Users can mark moments during the meeting, which are available as clips immediately after. The AI generates summaries and detects questions or action items. The free plan is remarkably generous, with unlimited recordings, making it a popular choice for startups and smaller teams that don't need heavy CRM features but do want to archive meetings.

Difference: Unlimited free recording and transcription

Choose this if: budget is an important factor

✓ What we like

✓Unlimited recording (free version)
✓Accurate transcription (English)
✓Handy 'Ask tl;dv' search feature
✓Easy clip creation and sharing

✗ What we don't like

✗Bot sometimes doesn't join or joins late
✗Struggles with accents/dialects
✗Sales coaching very expensive ($98/m)
✗Bugs when loading videos

View tl;dv →More details →

Otter

Real-time transcription and notes

Otter is one of the pioneers in AI transcription and is known for its focus on real-time speech-to-text conversion. The tool offers an 'OtterPilot' that automatically dials into meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. Otter excels at recognizing different speakers and displaying the transcription live. After the meeting, a summary is emailed and users can collaborate on the notes by adding comments or highlighting text. It is especially strong in English-language environments.

Difference: Focus on live transcription during the meeting

Choose this if: live reading along during the meeting is desired

✓ What we like

✓High transcription accuracy
✓OtterPilot automates note-taking
✓Convenient AI summaries
✓Integration with Zoom/Teams/Meet

✗ What we don't like

✗Very limited free plan
✗Only 3 imports in free version
✗No video recording (audio only)
✗Supports few languages

View Otter →More details →

Fathom

Individuals and quick sharing

★ 4.2/5 · Free / from 15 dollar

Fathom positions itself as a completely free AI note-taker for individual use, with paid options for teams. The tool integrates with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. A distinctive feature is the simple interface that lets you click buttons during the conversation to mark specific moments (for example, 'Action Item' or 'Positive Response'). Afterwards, the video is immediately available with transcription and summary. Fathom places strong emphasis on privacy and speed, and the generated summaries can easily be sent to systems like HubSpot or Slack.

Difference: Completely free version for individuals

Choose this if: a simple, free solution is sufficient

✓ What we like

✓Generous free version (unlimited recording)
✓High transcription accuracy
✓Seamless Zoom/Teams/Meet integration
✓Automatic action items & summary

✗ What we don't like

✗No full-featured mobile app
✗Advanced AI features are paid
✗Bot visible in meetings
✗Summaries sometimes too formal

View Fathom →More details →

Avoma

Sales and customer success teams

Avoma is more than just a meeting assistant; it's a 'Meeting Intelligence' platform focused on customer-facing teams. In addition to transcription and summaries, Avoma offers in-depth analyses of conversation patterns, such as talk time ratios and keyword analysis. It's designed to help sales and customer success teams improve their performance through coaching insights. The tool syncs notes directly with CRM systems like Salesforce and HubSpot. The AI notes are structured and can be customized to specific templates for different types of meetings.

Difference: Focus on coaching and CRM data enrichment

Choose this if: sales coaching and CRM hygiene are priorities

✓ What we like

✓Structured AI notes
✓Deep CRM integration (HubSpot/SF)
✓Coaching insights (talk time/ratio)
✓Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

✗Reliability issues (dropouts/late joins)
✗Hidden costs for extra features
✗Slow CRM sync (>60 min)
✗Transcription struggles with accents

View Avoma →More details →

Sembly

Teams that need to skip meetings

Sembly AI profiles itself as the 'smartest teammate' that attends meetings when you can't. A unique feature is 'Proxy Attendance', where the bot records and summarizes a meeting without the user needing to be present themselves. Sembly focuses strongly on distilling action items, decisions, and risks from conversations. The 'Glance View' provides quick insight into what was discussed. It supports multilingual transcription and offers integrations with task management tools to directly convert action items into tasks.

Difference: Proxy feature for absent participants

Choose this if: not everyone can be at every meeting

✓ What we like

✓Excellent summary structure
✓High accuracy for non-native speakers
✓Detects action items and risks
✓Supports 42+ languages

✗ What we don't like

✗Mobile app buggy and outdated
✗Free plan very limited (1 hour/month)
✗Bot gets stuck after meeting ends
✗Long meetings get split up

View Sembly →More details →

Grain

User research and product teams

Grain is designed to capture and share the 'voice of the customer'. Where other tools focus on complete transcriptions, Grain focuses on curating important moments. Users can create short video clips during or after the meeting to share insights with stakeholders. The AI notes are concise and immediately usable. Grain is widely used by product teams, researchers, and recruiters who want to isolate and share specific feedback or responses without colleagues having to watch an entire recording.

Difference: Focus on sharing short video clips

Choose this if: sharing clips is essential

✓ What we like

✓Automated notes & recordings
✓High audio quality & transcription
✓Clip & share video highlights
✓Integrations (Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot)

✗ What we don't like

✗Free plan limited to 20 meetings
✗Advanced features are paid
✗Lacks deep sales analytics (vs Gong)
✗Pricing transparency could be better

View Grain →More details →

Supernormal

Google Meet users

Supernormal focuses entirely on automating notes for Google Meet and Zoom, with a strong emphasis on formatting and presentation. The tool automatically recognizes the type of meeting and adapts the structure of the notes accordingly. It works via a Chrome extension or bot and delivers a cleanly formatted document almost immediately after the meeting. Supernormal is popular for the speed and quality of its text summaries, which often require less editing than those of competitors.

Difference: Automatic formatting of notes

Choose this if: clean, readable notes are the main goal

✓ What we like

✓Bot-free recording option (Google Meet)
✓Automatic, structured notes
✓Good action item extraction
✓Supports 60+ languages

✗ What we don't like

✗Free version recently heavily limited
✗No offline transcription available
✗Transcription struggles with accents
✗No 'click-on-text' video navigation

View Supernormal →More details →

Jamie

Discreet use without bots

Jamie stands out by not sending a virtual bot to the meeting. Instead, the software runs locally on the computer (macOS and Windows) and listens through the system audio. This makes it compatible with any meeting platform, even offline conversations. Jamie generates business-quality summaries and can even draft emails based on the discussed action items. Because there's no visible bot in the call, it feels more discreet and personal than tools like Otter or Fireflies.

Difference: No bot participating in the call

Choose this if: a visible recording bot is undesirable

✓ What we like

✓No bot joining the meeting
✓Works with all platforms (Zoom/Teams)
✓Privacy-focused (GDPR, data in Germany)
✓Works offline and in-person too

✗ What we don't like

✗Manual start/stop required
✗No video recording, audio only
✗Processing time can be lengthy
✗Pricey compared to competitors

View Jamie →More details →

Bluedot

Google Chrome power users

Bluedot is an AI extension for Google Chrome that functions as a non-intrusive recorder for Google Meet. It records locally through the browser, so no external bot is added to the conversation. Bluedot generates transcriptions and summaries tailored to specific use cases like engineering meetings or sales calls. The tool also offers the ability to create screen recordings outside of meetings, making it versatile for asynchronous communication. The focus is on privacy and integration within the browser workflow.

Difference: Browser extension instead of bot

Choose this if: Google Meet is the primary tool

✓ What we like

✓Bot-free recording via Chrome extension
✓Automatic summary & action items
✓Seamless CRM integration (HubSpot/Slack)
✓Includes screen and video recording

✗ What we don't like

✗Free plan limited to 5 meetings/month
✗Full features require Chrome
✗Mobile app less comprehensive
✗Transcription sometimes difficult with accents

View Bluedot →More details →

When is MeetGeek still the best choice?

MeetGeek works best for teams that want a complete overview of all meetings within the organization. The tool offers strong analytics and reporting at the team level, allowing managers to see how much time is spent on meetings and where improvements are possible. If you’re looking for insights into meeting patterns and productivity across multiple teams, MeetGeek provides specific functionality for that.

MeetGeek’s automated summaries are structured and consistent, which is useful if you value standardization. Teams that have regularly recurring meetings like standups, retrospectives, or client calls benefit from the templates and automatic action items. The integration with CRM systems and collaboration tools ensures that meeting information automatically ends up in the right place without manual work.

When is a MeetGeek alternative better?

If your budget is limited or you want to test extensively before paying, tools like tl;dv offer a more generous free plan. While MeetGeek fairly quickly requires a paid subscription for full functionality, with tl;dv you get unlimited recordings and transcriptions without paying. This makes a big difference for freelancers, small teams, or startups that aren’t ready yet for a monthly investment.

Some users don’t want a visible bot in their meetings because it’s distracting or creates an unprofessional impression with clients. Tools like Jamie and Bluedot work without a separate participant appearing in your video call. They record through your own audio without others seeing it. For sales teams that specifically need coaching and CRM integration, Avoma offers more targeted functionality than MeetGeek, with conversation scorecards and deeper analysis of sales calls.

In conclusion

Choose Fireflies if you need lots of integrations with other tools in your stack, or tl;dv if you want to review video recordings and are looking for a free plan. Otter is the best choice for real-time transcription during the meeting itself, while Fathom focuses on speed and simplicity for individual users. Sales and customer success teams will find the most relevant coaching features in Avoma. Consider which specific feature is most important for your situation and test the free plan before purchasing a paid subscription.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative has the best Dutch language support?

tl;dv and Fireflies generally offer good support for the Dutch language, although summaries are sometimes still generated in English depending on the settings.

Can I use these tools without others seeing it?

Tools like Jamie and Bluedot record locally without a 'bot' appearing as a participant in the meeting. With most other tools, the bot is visible to all participants.

Also check out

All alternatives →