Alternatives

12 Best Notta Alternatives

Ruud CarisEditor-in-Chief

Updated: 28 January 2026About Notta →

Notta is popular for its real-time transcription and broad language support, but users often look for alternatives for better integrations, specific team features, or a different pricing model. The tools below offer similar functionality for recording, transcribing, and summarizing meetings.

136+ toolscompared

✓No sponsored rankings

My recommendations

Best Overall

Fireflies

★ 4.2/5

Excellent integrations and AI search features

View Fireflies →

Best Free

Fathom

★ 4.2/5

Unlimited free recording for individuals

View Fathom →

Most Similar

Otter

Similar interface and focus on transcription

View Otter →

Best Budget

Tactiq

★ 4.2/5

Affordable option via browser extension

View Tactiq →

At a glance

ToolScoreBest for

Otter

English-language meetings and teamsView →

Fireflies

★4.2/5

Automation and CRM integrationsView →

tl;dv

Video recordings and clip sharingView →

Fathom

★4.2/5

Individuals and quick notesView →

Tactiq

★4.2/5

Users who don't want botsView →

MeetGeek

Teams who want to measure meeting qualityView →

Supernormal

Google Meet usersView →

Grain

User research and sales teamsView →

Sembly

Busy professionals with double bookingsView →

Avoma

Sales and account managementView →

Read.ai

Teams fighting meeting fatigueView →

Plaud

In-person meetings and phone callsView →

All Notta alternatives at a glance

Otter

English-language meetings and teams

Otter is a direct competitor to Notta and focuses heavily on English transcription and collaboration. The tool records audio, transcribes it, and identifies different speakers. Users can add comments and create highlights during the meeting. OtterPilot can automatically join Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams meetings to take notes, even if the user isn't present. The focus is on text processing and searchability of spoken content.

Difference: Fewer languages supported than Notta

Choose this if: accurate English transcription is a priority

✓ What we like

✓High transcription accuracy
✓OtterPilot automates note-taking
✓Convenient AI summaries
✓Integration with Zoom/Teams/Meet

✗ What we don't like

✗Very limited free plan
✗Only 3 imports in free version
✗No video recording (audio only)
✗Supports few languages

View Otter →More details →

Fireflies

Automation and CRM integrations

★ 4.2/5 · Free / from 10 dollar

Fireflies.ai is a meeting assistant that integrates with a wide range of business apps like Salesforce, Slack, and Asana. The tool focuses on automating post-meeting workflows. The AI bot, Fred, joins conversations and generates transcripts and summaries. A unique feature is the ability to analyze conversations based on specific keywords and sentiment, which is valuable for sales and recruitment teams looking to discover patterns in conversations.

Difference: Deeper integration with business software

Choose this if: CRM integration is essential

✓ What we like

✓Automatic meeting attendance
✓Strong integrations (Slack, CRM)
✓Good AI summaries
✓Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

✗Struggles with accents/jargon
✗Speaker recognition inaccurate
✗Video recording is pricey

View Fireflies →More details →

tl;dv

Video recordings and clip sharing

tl;dv stands out with a strong focus on video and timestamps. The tool works with Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams and allows users to mark important moments during the conversation. Afterwards, a recording with transcription is provided where you can jump directly to marked moments. The tool supports more than 30 languages and offers the ability to create and share short clips from meetings, which is useful for asynchronous updates.

Difference: Focus on video clips instead of plain text

Choose this if: visual context is important

✓ What we like

✓Unlimited recording (free version)
✓Accurate transcription (English)
✓Handy 'Ask tl;dv' search feature
✓Easy clip creation and sharing

✗ What we don't like

✗Bot sometimes doesn't join or joins late
✗Struggles with accents/dialects
✗Sales coaching very expensive ($98/m)
✗Bugs when loading videos

View tl;dv →More details →

Fathom

Individuals and quick notes

★ 4.2/5 · Free / from 15 dollar

Fathom is popular for its generous free model for individual users. The tool records meetings, transcribes them, and summarizes them with no limit on recording duration in the free version. It offers a simple interface where users can click buttons during the conversation to mark action items or highlights. After the meeting, notes are immediately available and can be automatically synced with CRM systems like HubSpot or Salesforce (in paid team editions).

Difference: Unlimited free use for individuals

Choose this if: budget is the main factor

✓ What we like

✓Generous free version (unlimited recording)
✓High transcription accuracy
✓Seamless Zoom/Teams/Meet integration
✓Automatic action items & summary

✗ What we don't like

✗No full-featured mobile app
✗Advanced AI features are paid
✗Bot visible in meetings
✗Summaries sometimes too formal

View Fathom →More details →

Tactiq

Users who don't want bots

★ 4.2/5 · Free / from 8 dollar

Tactiq works differently than most competitors; it's a browser extension and not a bot that joins the meeting. It reads the captions from Google Meet, Zoom, or Teams and saves them directly as a transcript. This makes it less intrusive for other participants. Tactiq uses AI to generate summaries and action items afterwards. Because it works locally in the browser, it's often faster and more privacy-friendly for users who don't want an extra 'participant' in their call.

Difference: Browser extension instead of bot

Choose this if: discretion during meetings is required

✓ What we like

✓Bot-free Chrome extension
✓Real-time transcription during calls
✓Free plan for individuals (10/month)
✓Integrations with Slack, Notion, Drive

✗ What we don't like

✗No video or audio recording
✗Accuracy lower with accents
✗Free limit of 10 meetings per month
✗No full-featured mobile app

View Tactiq →More details →

MeetGeek

Teams that want to measure meeting quality

MeetGeek focuses on improving meeting culture by providing insights into how time is spent. In addition to transcription and summaries, the tool provides scores for meetings based on punctuality, participation, and sentiment. The system archives all conversations in a searchable knowledge base. The 'Auto-tags' feature automatically recognizes important moments like concerns, tasks, or decisions without the user having to manually mark anything during the conversation.

Difference: Focus on analytics and meeting culture

Choose this if: insight into team efficiency is needed

✓ What we like

✓High transcription accuracy
✓Supports 60+ languages
✓Good AI summaries & action items
✓Integrations with HubSpot, Slack, Trello

✗ What we don't like

✗Bot sometimes joins late (about 1 min)
✗Spammy emails to participants
✗Limited video recording in free plan
✗Support sometimes responds slowly

View MeetGeek →More details →

Supernormal

Google Meet users

Supernormal is designed for speed and works closely with Google Meet (and Zoom). The tool is known for its very fast processing of notes immediately after a conversation ends. Users can choose from different note templates, depending on the type of meeting (e.g., customer interview, daily stand-up). This ensures structured output that's immediately shareable. The system learns from corrections users make to improve future notes.

Difference: Use of specific note templates

Choose this if: structured output is immediately needed

✓ What we like

✓Bot-free recording option (Google Meet)
✓Automatic, structured notes
✓Good action item extraction
✓Supports 60+ languages

✗ What we don't like

✗Free version recently heavily limited
✗No offline transcription available
✗Transcription struggles with accents
✗No 'click-on-text' video navigation

View Supernormal →More details →

Grain

User research and sales teams

Grain positions itself as a tool for customer insights. It's a favorite among product teams, researchers, and sales. Instead of just text, Grain enables users to clip and share video clips in a 'highlight reel'. This makes it easy to share the voice of the customer directly with stakeholders. The AI summarizes conversations and identifies key feedback points. The library feature makes it possible to centrally search knowledge from previous conversations.

Difference: Focus on curation of video clips

Choose this if: video evidence is important for stakeholders

✓ What we like

✓Automated notes & recordings
✓High audio quality & transcription
✓Clip & share video highlights
✓Integrations (Slack, Salesforce, HubSpot)

✗ What we don't like

✗Free plan limited to 20 meetings
✗Advanced features are paid
✗Lacks deep sales analytics (vs Gong)
✗Pricing transparency could be better

View Grain →More details →

Sembly

Busy professionals with double bookings

Sembly positions itself as the 'smartest' teammate that never misses a meeting. A core feature is 'Proxy Attendance', where the bot attends a meeting on behalf of the user and provides a report. Sembly is strong at distilling tasks and action items from conversations and can forward these directly to task management apps. The 'Glance' feature provides a quick summary of the topic and outcome without having to read the entire transcript.

Difference: Proxy attendance at meetings

Choose this if: attendance at every meeting is impossible

✓ What we like

✓Excellent summary structure
✓High accuracy for non-native speakers
✓Detects action items and risks
✓Supports 42+ languages

✗ What we don't like

✗Mobile app buggy and outdated
✗Free plan very limited (1 hour/month)
✗Bot gets stuck after meeting ends
✗Long meetings get split up

View Sembly →More details →

Avoma

Sales and account management

Avoma offers an all-in-one solution for the complete meeting lifecycle: from preparation and agendas to transcription and analysis. It's more than just a note-taking tool; it helps with scheduling the agenda prior to the conversation. Avoma is primarily focused on customer-facing teams (Sales and Customer Success) and offers advanced features such as deal intelligence and coaching insights. Transcription is combined with human editing options in higher-tier plans for maximum accuracy.

Difference: Complete meeting lifecycle management

Choose this if: agenda management is also desired

✓ What we like

✓Structured AI notes
✓Deep CRM integration (HubSpot/SF)
✓Coaching insights (talk time/ratio)
✓Searchable transcripts

✗ What we don't like

✗Reliability issues (dropouts/late joins)
✗Hidden costs for extra features
✗Slow CRM sync (>60 min)
✗Transcription struggles with accents

View Avoma →More details →

Read.ai

Teams fighting meeting fatigue

Read.ai focuses on 'Meeting Wellness'. In addition to transcription and summaries, the tool measures participant engagement, speaking time distribution, and sentiment in real-time. It scores the meeting to make teams aware of efficiency. The tool also offers a 'For You' overview that filters relevant news and updates from meetings. Read.ai integrates video playback with an augmented reality-like display of statistics during review.

Difference: Real-time measurement of engagement

Choose this if: meeting efficiency needs to be improved

✓ What we like

✓Accurate transcriptions (multilingual)
✓Handy 'Search Copilot' feature
✓Good integration with Zoom and Teams
✓Saves a lot of time taking notes

✗ What we don't like

✗Adds itself to calls uninvited
✗Privacy concerns and broad data access
✗Difficult to delete account/data
✗Poor customer service

View Read.ai →More details →

Plaud

In-person meetings and phone calls

Plaud stands out through the combination of hardware (the Plaud NotePin or Note) and software. It's designed to record not only online meetings, but also in-person conversations and phone calls. The device clips magnetically onto a phone or is worn. The accompanying app transcribes the audio and uses AI for summaries and mind maps. This makes it a unique solution for people who are frequently on the go or have face-to-face meetings.

Difference: Hardware component for offline recordings

Choose this if: online meetings are not the main focus

✓ What we like

✓Ultra-thin credit card format (3mm)
✓Clear recordings via vibration sensor
✓Convenient MagSafe attachment
✓Accurate AI summaries

✗ What we don't like

✗Subscription required for advanced AI
✗Customer service responds slowly/poorly
✗App sometimes has sync issues
✗Proprietary charging cable

View Plaud →More details →

When is Notta still the best choice?

Notta remains a strong option if you’re looking for a reliable transcription tool that supports both audio and video in over 100 languages. The tool excels in accuracy for multilingual meetings and offers a user-friendly interface that requires little learning time. For teams that regularly have international meetings or need to transcribe content in different languages, Notta is a logical choice.

Notta’s AI summaries are practical for those who want to quickly get through long meetings without having to manually search through every detail. You get automatically generated action items and key points, which is especially useful for project managers and team leaders. The free plan offers 120 minutes of transcription per month, which is sufficient for light users who occasionally want to capture a meeting.

When is a Notta alternative better?

If you need deeper CRM integrations with platforms like HubSpot or Salesforce, you’ll run into limitations with Notta. Tools like Fireflies offer native connections with these systems and can automatically sync conversation data with your sales processes. For sales teams that want to document every customer interaction in their CRM, this is an important difference.

If you need an unlimited free plan for individual use, alternatives like Otter are more interesting. Otter gives you 300 free monthly minutes versus Notta’s 120 minutes. For those who mainly want to create video recordings and share specific clips with colleagues or clients, tl;dv offers more functionality. You can create timestamps there, cut highlights, and share video clips directly without recipients having to watch the full recording.

Users who don’t want meeting bots in their meetings are better off choosing Tactiq. This Chrome extension works locally in your browser without a visible bot joining your Google Meet or Zoom session, making privacy-sensitive conversations less disruptive.

In conclusion

Choose Notta if multilingual support and simplicity are your priorities. Go with Fireflies when CRM integrations are central to your workflow, or with Otter if you want a more generous free plan for personal use. Teams that want to repurpose video content and share clips would do well to check out tl;dv, while Fathom is suitable for individual users who want quick notes without complex features. Check out the full comparison below to see which tool best fits your specific situation.

Frequently asked questions

Which alternative has the best Dutch transcription?

Tools like tl;dv and Fireflies offer good support for Dutch, often using the same underlying AI models (such as OpenAI's Whisper) as Notta.

Can I use these tools without a bot joining?

Yes, Tactiq works via a browser extension and reads captions, so there's no visible bot in the meeting. Plaud is a physical device that also doesn't require a bot.

Are there completely free alternatives to Notta?

Fathom offers a completely free version for individuals with no limit on recording duration, making it one of the most generous free options.

Also check out

All alternatives →